Corporate IT Planning for 2002/2003
The
Prioritised list of Projects
Monitoring
Progress
Current Status
The
Planning Process
Business Area Index
Review of Planning Process
Monitoring Progress of the 2002/2003 IT Plans
Throughout 2002/2003 MIS will update and publish a projects status
list as at the end of the previous month. This list is based on a variation of the
approved prioritised list of
potential projects for 2002/2003 but also shows unfinished projects carried forward from
2001-2002 and new approved projects that were not known about when the
original plans were prioritised. Status and descriptions are listed below.
| Not Yet Planned | Business area and MIS have not yet planned the project |
| Planned | MIS and Business area have agreed when project could start |
| In Progress | MIS is working on the project i.e. TOR approved & time has been recorded against project |
| Implemented | MIS deliverable has been achieved |
| Closed | MIS part of the project formally closed off by Business area |
| Suspended | MIS and Business area have agreed to temporarily stop work on the project |
| Deferred | Project will be deferred to a future year |
| Withdrawn | Project no longer required |
Current Statistics - as at 31 July 2003
| Project Status List | List of all project, statuses and time recorded | PDF version |
| Summary Statistics | Project status summary | PDF version |
| Summary Statistics by Bias | Project status summary by business area | PDF version |
| 6 month summary | Summary of progress after 6 months |
NOTE:
As a result of feedback from MIC two changes took effect from end November 2002:
1) Project status list was reordered to show all support projects at the top of the list.
2) Project status statistics are displayed in slightly differently format:-a) All support projects i.e. work to keep existing systems/services running are shown as a separate line.
b) Statistics on projects 'below the line' are NOT shown as the expectation is that very few, if any will get done in 2002-3.
c) Statistics on any 'new' projects or any projects below the line which the Director of MIS gives approval to go ahead in 2002-3 are now shown in a section called 'New Approved Projects'.The status statistics as at end of August, September and October held in the archive remain unchanged but will be flagged 'old format'.
Archive Statistics
| Aug 2002 (Old Format) |
Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| Sept 2002 (Old Format) |
Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| Oct 2002 (Old Format) |
Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| Nov 2002 | Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| Dec 2002 | Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| Jan 2003 | Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| Feb 2003 | Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| Mar 2003 | Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| Apr 2003 | Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| May 2003 | Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
| Jun 2003 | Project Status List PDF | Summary Statistics PDF | Summary Statistics by Bias PDF |
Details
of the Planning Process for arriving at the 2002/2003 IT Plans
A new process was introduced for academic year 2002/2003 aimed at a more
holistic approach to Corporate IT planning that both engages the plans for IT
with those for the business and prioritises across the different business areas.
There was a more detailed discussion
of the issues around this and the resources available to MIS at the October MIC.
In addition a paper covering some of the issues
to consider when planning was issued in October 2001.
During December 2001 and January 2002 MIS and Business partners developed project proposals and costed them. This work was then prioritised through a number of iterations involving consultation with the Faculty Group Officers seeking views from devolved administrators, Management Information Committee, Heads of Support Group 2, and senior Faculty Group Managers as a proxy for the future College structure. This process produced a prioritised list of potential projects and agreement from the MIS business partners that they could resource their part of the plan.
Below is a grid which enables the reader to access the details of the IT projects for each business area, an index of projects containing a brief description of each project with a link through to the more detailed proposal document, project costings and comments from each business area regarding the overall priorities.
| Overview of Projects |
Project Index | Project Costs | Priority Comments | |
| Accommodation Services | Overview | Index | Costs | David Ross |
| Estates | Overview | Index | Costs | Angus Currie |
| Finance | Overview | Index | Costs | Elizabeth Welch |
| Human Resources | Overview | Index | Costs | Ian Pilbeam |
| MIS | Overview | Index | Costs | Mark Ritchie |
| Other Areas | Overview | Index | Costs | Bob Porrer |
| Research | No Projects | |||
| Student, Admissions & Curricula | Overview | Index | Costs | Fiona Longstaff |
The prioritised list is not actually the MIS plan, that is dependent on a wide
number of other issues such as availability of resources, interdependencies
between projects, etc. but is a critical input to the planning process which is
ongoing and iterative. However, the priority list will be reported on in future
years and as such all new projects undertaken by MIS must refer to the priority
list or explain why they are not on the list so that we can show how well we
have delivered against our priorities.
Review of
2002/2003 Planning Process
A paper
reviewing the planning process detailed above was presented to and accepted at
the MIC meeting held on 5th June 2002.