(back to index)

Responsive MyEd and EdWeb Integration

Proposal Sponsor: 
Martin Morrey

Overview

The online experience of University members is currently highly fragmented.  The two most important fragments are the University Website (UWS) and MyEd.

  • The University Website (UWS)
    • Unauthenticated end-users
    • Hosts a large amount of support information for University services
  • The University Portal (MyEd)
    • Authenticated users – University members
    • Access to online services, personalised information, and notifications

A clear vision for online student experience has been set out in a recent report on the Student Experience Project by Sheila Green:

Students have easy access to consistently high quality online information and services, which meet or exceed their expectations at a place, time and in a way that meets their individual needs.   

There is a major opportunity to create a consistent user experience between the UWS and MyEd, because:

  • The University now has Global Experience Language (GEL) including
    • Recommended approaches to a range of common UI patterns
    • A reference implementation in Twitter Bootstrap
  • The theme of the new UWS applies the GEL implementation of Bootstrap
  • The latest version of uPortal, the platform MyEd is based-on, has a responsive theme based on Bootstrap

Grasping this opportunity would address the problem of the current mismatch between the user interfaces of the UWS and MyEd:

  • In 2015 the University Website (UWS) will:
    • Be fully responsive
    • Conform to the University GEL
  • The University Portal (MyEd)
    • Has a new mobile interface, but is not yet responsive
    • Does not conform the University GEL

The project also seeks to better integrate MyEd and the UWS by:

  • Designing and implementing a shared information architecture
  • Showing key information in MyEd to authenticated users of the UWS
  • Providing an unauthenticated view of MyEd, using uPortal “guest” layout

The ultimate aim is making MyEd into “the part of University website you log-in to”.

Other contributors: 
Paul Johnson, Neil Allison, Stratos Filalithis
What would happen if the project did not take place?: 
  • If the project did not take place, the University’s online experience would remain fundamentally fragmented
  • This is an inferior experience to that which most people are likely to get from their bank, utility provider, member organisation, local government etc.
Additional information: 

Known dependencies

Development required within EdWeb in Y2 (see complimentary proposal by Neil Allison and Stratos Filalithis, University Web Programme)

Known risks

Fundamental incompatibilities between EdWeb and uPortal (Respondr) implementation of Twitter Bootstrap

Assumptions

EdWeb becomes the single corporate CMS, with the current Polopoly service being decommissioned from early 2016.

Who does it affect?: 
  • MyEd Users
    • Receive a user experience more consistent with the University website
  • University members (staff, students, applicants, alumni, visitors) using the UWS
    • Easier access to MyEd functionality
    • Richer, more personalised experience
  • IS Applications Division
    • Year 1
      • Upgrade MyEd platform to latest version of uPortal (e.g. 4.1 or 4.2)
      • Authenticated REST web services for exposing key MyEd feeds to the UWS
        • Open to any University domain using CORS
    • Year 2
      • Implement agreed changes to MyEd layouts and groups
      • Implement agreed enhancements to EdWeb platform (separate proposal in UWP programme)
  • IS LTW Division
    • Year 1:
      • WGI: Apply the GEL implementation of Bootstrap to MyEd
      • Proof-of-concept integration with EdWeb distribution
    • Year 2:
      • WGI & UWP: Design cross-service information architecture (IA)
        • Navigational elements which integrate the two services
        • Revised layouts for MyEd which align with overall IA
      • UWP: Integrate personalised information into relevant contexts of UWS
Why is it needed/What are the benefits?: 

Because applicants, students and staff will have one place to go for all their academic-support content, service-support content, personalised information and status information, and will have consistent user experience for all of these, there will be:

  • Reduced support effort from IS for applicants, students and staff
  • Reduced support effort from Student Systems for applicants and students
  • Simpler communications
  • Less dissatisfaction with online services amongst students and staff
BI/MI requirement?: 

N/A

External costs?: 

N/A

Compliance justification (if relevant): 

N/A

Fit with University strategy: 

Goals – Excellence in Education

 

Select appropriate option(s) and provide brief explanation including reference/link to directional statement where appropriate

 

From the University’s Strategic Plan (2012-2016):

·      Intrastructure Objectives- to meet our aim we will

o   Pursue consistency and continuity in quality and experience across all elements of our …. information technology infrastructures.

o   Achieve greater integration of information technology infrastructure …

·      Infrastructure Strategies – we will achieve our objectives by

o   Putting in place information and communications technology … to support individual and group study and working, both on-campus and mobile.

·      Outstanding Student Experience Objectives - to meet our aim we will

o   Combine our recognised teaching excellence with an outstanding student experience both on-campus and online.

o   Take a cohesive, inclusive and individualised approach to enhancing our student experience that encompasses all ... student services …

 

Goals – Excellence in Research

 

Goals – Excellence in Innovation

 

Enablers - People

 

Enablers - Infrastructure

x

Enablers - Finance

 

Themes – Outstanding student experience

x

Themes – Global Impact

 

Themes – Lifelong community

 

Themes – Social responsibility

 

Themes – Partnerships

 

Themes – Equality & widening participation

 

 

Score for portfolio comparison: 

Programme Priority (per separate guidance)

1

Overall Priority

(per separate guidance)

2

Programme Scoring (per separate guidance)

1.Alignment with University Strategic Plan/Business Objectives

2x3 = 6

2.Risk of not doing the project

1x2=2

3.Benefits relative to cost

1x2=2

4.Time to deliver tangible benefit

2x1=2

TOTAL SCORE

12

 

Planning Status: 
Approved
Programme Priority: 
1
Overall Priority: 
2
Portfolio: 
ISG
Planned Start: 
15/16
Multi-Year: 
Yes
Project Owner: 
ISG
Procurement > £50K: 
No
Funding Source: 
Core Grant
IS Admin Tab
Estimation Reference: 

Estimation Types: Select the relevant option(s) – each option must be estimated separately

Business Case / Options Appraisal (BUS)

 

Software Development (in-house) (SWD)

X

IT Solution Procurement (BUY)

 

Agile Software Development (in-house) (AGL)

 

3rd Party IT Solution Implementation (IMP)

 

Software Development and Configuration within Student Systems Partnership (SSP)

 

IT Infrastructure (TEC)

 

 

 

Estimated IS Apps Days
(see additional guidance*)

 

15/16 – Large

 

16/17 - Small

 

Estimated Business Partner Days

15/16 – Large

 

 

16/17 - Medium

Estimated Service

Management Days

N/A

Impact on other Service area

N/A

 

Estimation Confidence (delete as required)

Reasonably Confident (Similar to previous work)

 

Estimation References

 

 

Estimation Type: 
Software Development (in-house)
Estimation Confidence: 
Reasonably Confident (similar to previous work)
Estimated IS Apps Days: 
Large
Estimated Business Partner Days: 
Large
Impact on other service area: 

N/A

(back to index)