Close
Project Summary:
Deliverables Achieved and Project Sponsor Sign Off |
Were the project goals met? Yes - 2 phases of work delivered and 2 business analysis completed Were the project deliverables fully or partially accomplished? Yes - fully met
|
To deliver small-scale enhancements to the EUCLID student record system application (Externally driven by statutory requirements) This will be delivered in multiple phases , each phase will have its own business requirements document (BRD) written by SACS Registry, IS Apps will deliver SITS configuration to meet the business requirements
Each Enhancement will be coded "E#" and will be given it 's own project container at a sub-project level to record individual milestones and RAG status
Current project status
| Report Date | RAG | Budget | Effort Completed | Effort to complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2013 | GREEN | 43.0 days | 35.0 days | 0.0 |
HR are seeking to improve recruitment at the University with the introduction of a new recruitment system which will be used across the whole recruitment lifecycle (i.e. vacancy creation, advertising, interview, selection, appointment). The system was selected under project HRS063 with assistance from a user group made up of representatives from across the University.
The aim of this project is to implement the system provided by Core International at the University.
Current project status
| Report Date | RAG | Budget | Effort Completed | Effort to complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2013 | BLUE | 450.0 days | 450.0 days | 2.0 |
Project Summary:
Analysis of Resource Usage:
Staff Usage Estimate: 1 days
Staff Usage Actual: 1 days
Staff Usage Variance: 0%
Other Resource Estimate: 1 days
Other Resource Actual: 1 days
Other Resource Variance: 0%
Explanation for variance:
Key Learning Points:
Outstanding issues:
Project Summary:
Analysis of Resource Usage:
Staff Usage Estimate: 1 days
Staff Usage Actual: 1 days
Staff Usage Variance: 0%
Other Resource Estimate: 1 days
Other Resource Actual: 1 days
Other Resource Variance: 0%
Explanation for variance:
Key Learning Points:
Outstanding issues:
Project Summary:
Contributors
Role | Department | Name |
Project Manager (Owner) |
|
|
Programme Manager |
|
|
Production Management Coordinator |
|
|
Business Area Manager |
|
Project Summary:
Project Team
Role | Department | Name |
Project Manager (Owner) | IS Project Services | Sue Woodger |
Programme Manager | IS Project Services |
This proposal is to upgrade the existing Oracle database owned by Integrated Services, from Oracle 9.2 to 11.2.
The current version of the Oracle EUPS DEV, TEST and LIVE databases is 9.2. Oracle 9.2 is past its Extended Support date. The three EUPS databases should be upgraded to lower the cost to the University, to mitigate security issues and to enable the business owner to take advantage of new features which IS have currently implemented (SOA) and which IS will implement in the future.
Current project status
| Report Date | RAG | Budget | Effort Completed | Effort to complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2013 | BLUE | 27.0 days | 27.5 days | 0.0 |
Project Summary:
Contributors
Role | Department | Name |
Project Manager (Owner) |
|
|
Programme Manager |
|
|
Production Management Coordinator |
|
|
Business Area Manager |
|
Currently research award information is managed by Edinburgh Research and Innovation (ERI) and Finance Research Grants. ERI are focused on pre-award information, while Research Grants are focused on post-award information. ERI’s main IT system to administrate pre-award information is InfoEd, which has a fEC costing tool. Research Grants use eFinancials as their main IT system to store and administrate post-award details. Both ERI and Research Grants have a number of Excel sheets, MS-Access databases and manual processes to support their main IT systems.
Current project status
| Report Date | RAG | Budget | Effort Completed | Effort to complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| August 2012 | BLUE | 0.0 days | 0.0 days | 0.0 |