IS Applications 3-Year Planning 2016/17 to 2018/19
Proposal Suggestion Template OVERVIEW
Portfolio |
CHSS |
Programme Name |
|
Proposal Name
|
Procurement of an online Academic Workload Modelling solution |
Proposal Sponsor |
Fraser Muir |
Other Contributors |
|
||
Need, problem, or opportunity? |
Need
|
||
What would happen if the project did not take place? |
If the project itself did not go ahead, the College would continue to operate inefficiently using its current varied and sub optimal excel spreadsheet based models. We would continue to not be able to properly model and forecast academic modelling. |
||
Additional Information |
Include any supporting information, including:
Needs to be highly connected to HR, Student Records, Timetable. Therefore stakeholder input on project from above important. Pilot School first, then roll-out to College if pilot meets success criteria.
|
||
When is it needed? |
Start Year: 2016/17 Less than a year
|
IMPACT
Who does it affect? |
All academic staff in the College, plus senior administrators in College and Schools
|
Does it impact other business areas? |
Student Systems UHRS Timetabling
|
Why it is needed / what the benefits are |
The system will allow the College to more effectively model ts academic workload, will improve planning and will provide the abilitry to forecast. Ultimately it will enable more effective use of our academic workforce and will lead to potential savings through avoidance of unnecessary recruitment.
|
Procurement activity required? |
Yes, this is a system procurement project. |
BI/MI requirement? |
Yes, although initially only through the system itself. The College BI team will define and manage the BI element of the system, exporting to College Qlikview dashboards as necessary.
|
External costs? |
c£100k over 4 years, assuming the pilot is successful and it gradually expands to all academic staff in the College.
|
CATEGORY
Type of work |
Discretionary |
Funding Source |
Sponsor Funded |
*Compliance Justification |
Please select corresponding criteria below: |
||
Meet external legislative requirement |
|
||
Address obsolescence of technology component |
|
||
Maintain critical University business system AND no practical workarounds available |
|
||
Provide further brief details re. why this should be considered Compliance |
|
FIT WITH UNIVERSITY STRATEGY
Goals – Excellence in Education |
X |
The WAM tool will enable to the College and Schools to manage its staffing resource more effectively, enabling them to undertake their work in education, research and innovation more effectively.
In addition, this enables better financial management as the staffing resource accounts for over 80% of College costs. |
Goals – Excellence in Research |
X |
|
Goals – Excellence in Innovation |
X |
|
Enablers - People |
X |
|
Enablers - Infrastructure |
|
|
Enablers - Finance |
X |
|
Themes – Outstanding student experience |
|
|
Themes – Global Impact |
|
|
Themes – Lifelong community |
|
|
Themes – Social responsibility |
|
|
Themes – Partnerships |
|
|
Themes – Equality & widening participation |
|
SCORE FOR PORTFOLIO COMPARISON
Programme Priority (per separate guidance) |
2 |
|
Overall Priority (per separate guidance) |
1 |
|
Programme Scoring (per separate guidance) |
1.Alignment with University Strategic Plan/Business Objectives |
|
2.Risk of not doing the project |
|
|
3.Benefits relative to cost |
|
|
4.Time to deliver tangible benefit |
|
|
TOTAL SCORE |
|
ESTIMATION
Estimation Types: Select the relevant option(s) – each option must be estimated separately |
||||
Business Case / Options Appraisal (BUS) |
|
Software Development (in-house) (SWD) |
|
|
IT Solution Procurement (BUY) |
20 |
Agile Software Development (in-house) (AGL) |
|
|
3rd Party IT Solution Implementation (IMP) |
30 |
Software Development and Configuration within Student Systems Partnership (SSP) |
|
|
IT Infrastructure (TEC) |
|
|
|
|
Estimated IS Apps Days (see additional guidance*)
|
S
|
Estimated Business Partner Days |
S |
|
Estimated Service Management Days |
|
Impact on other Service area |
|
|
Estimation Confidence (delete as required) |
Reasonably Confident (Similar to previous work)
|
|||
Estimation References |
Relatively simple procurement against UK Gov framework. Cloud-based system. Mechansisms for integration to University SSO and data feeds. Feeds can be manual for purposes of pilot.
|
|||
*Estimation – Additional Guidance:
For our 1st stage / iteration of the Plan / Red Line, the following standard estimation categorisations will be used:
- Small – this is based on average expected outturn of around 50 days (+ or – 20%)
- Medium – this is based on average expected outturn of around 100 days (+ or – 20%)
- Large – this is based on average expected outturn of around 200 days (+ or – 20%)
- Extra Large – this is based on average expected outturn of around 400 days (+ or – 20%)
Individual proposal allocations will be made using the expected outturn figure and an allocation equivalent to 20% of each estimate will be added as Contingency to each Programme.