Fraser Muir |
Project Sponsor |
Signed off 25-Jul with following actions updated
- D3.3 – unfortunately I am unable to take sole responsibility to deliver this. I will of course advise and assist project services.
- We are missing a deliverable of a communication plan, owned by Project Services and Students' Association.
- We are missing a deliverable, owned by Students' Association, to plan and deliver a promotional plan for the pilots, with the reps and the students on those programmes.
- The Resources, Skills and Costs section doesn’t make sense. What’s the purpose of this section?
- My Business Area denoted is incorrect, it should be CAHSS College Office.
|
Anne Mathison |
Project Manager |
Changes updated and Brief signed off 25-July |
Muriel Mewissen |
Programme Manager |
Thanks, I’m happy to sign off. I only have one point:
- Success Criteria – I think we need to make a separation between the success of the project and the success of the pilot. The project can be a success even if the pilot isn’t because we found that the platforms don’t help students. So I would say that for the project, the success criteria are 2 platforms set up and in use for a year + your first bullet point on the survey. While the last two are for success criteria for the pilot. I would leave them all in but qualify them.
- Updated 11-Jul-19 AM
|
Charlotte Higgins |
Project Services Intern |
Happy with the updates - 25-Jul |
Stephen Smith |
MS Teams - Senior Supplier |
Reviewed and signed off 23-Jul |
Karen Howie |
Blackboard Learn - Senior Supplier |
Happy to approve 23-Jul |
Megan Brown |
Senior User - Students' Association |
- Please can we use the term ‘Programme Rep’ not ‘Student Programme Rep’ (for example in the background section)
- Please can we say ‘the Students’ Association’ rather than EUSA as we’re moving away from the acronym where possible
- In the scope section, PGR is out of scope in terms of the pilot (although I’m not sure I should make the decision alone as to whether it’s out of the project as a whole)
- Could we add Karen and Stephen’s names to the pilots of Learn and Teams respectively in the ‘Objectives and Deliverables’ section
- In the benefits section, I’m not sure whether we could say that this will ‘make it quicker for the University to respond to issues raised by the student body’ as ultimately reps are still likely to use existing mechanisms such as SSLCs to give their feedback. 18-Jul
Also added into the scope section, 'PGR is out of scope in terms of the pilot. 23-Jul
|
Sheila Fraser |
Directors Office |
Success criteria - to achieve a reasonable evaluation across the Colleges including UG and PG. 19-Jul |
Victoria Dishon |
Directors Office |
Prefer that CSE should propose programmes to the Students' Association for inclusion. 23-Jul |