Overview
Background
The LMP005 project was initiated for to cover project activities aligned to the integration of the Library Management system provided by 3rd party supplier to the University's Finance System e-Financials.
The project covered the development of a one-way feed from Library Management System - Alma to Finance System e-Financials for the update of invoice / purchase order information. The scope included:
- The system must be able to provide integration with the corporate finance system (Advanced Business Solutions eFinancials v4.1). This includes invoices, vendors, fund allocations, chart of accounts.
- The export/import of financial data into eFinancials. The master copy information being retained within the corporate finance system (including supplier information, supplier codes), updates pushed through to the library system to allow purchasing from within the system that automatically updates budget and transaction information within eFinancials.
- Provision of an authorisations solution that is automated, passing tasks for authorisation to the appropriate individuals.
- The system allows for changes to any standing data (e.g. global VAT rates, currency, commitments).
The following requirement was out of scope of the previous LMP005 project.
- Two way feed between Library Management System - Alma and E-Financials
This means there is currently no sight of Purchase Orders raised in Alma (with a around (£7.9m) in the eFinancials system) and this requires to be addressed to meet Internal Audit requirements. This results in the following issues:
- Reconciliation of the systems is challenging and requires manual intervention. The Internal Audit report from April 2017 identified "reconciliation reports are prepared to highlight variances by cost centre headings. These reports are reviewed by the Materials Budget Group. This acts as a partially compensating control in the current absence of an automated reconciliation and utilising current resources. In order to automate the reconciliation process, it would be necessary to take this forward as a project".
- Discrepancies arise relating to the lack of commitment figures shown in eFinancials. (Including PO's, annual subscriptions, etc)
- Due to the issues above Committee papers are often left exposed and require resource to manage additional scrutiny.
Scope
It was agreed the structure of this project should be separated into different strands, focusing on areas where development work could be undertaken (i.e. purchase order export and good receipting in Sterling (precedent with SciQuest and EBIS) and others we probably will not (i.e. foreign payments). This project will therefore undertake analysis (viability and feasibility review) to identify the benefits, risks and issues relating to progressing a two way feed between Alma and E-Financials (or other potential future Finance system).
In addition the project will:
- Look at each of the actions required to negate current issues (what can we do now / what has to happen in the future finance system).
- Create a glossary of financial and equivalent library terminologies to support this and any future projects aligned to it.
- Continuations/partially receipted orders.
Out of Scope
- Foreign currency payments and sterling non-VAT.
- Technical options for delivery of the requirements.
It should also be noted this project is separate from the Implementation project which has funding (est. 150 days) identified within the 2018/19 budget.
Objectives and Deliverables
The deliverables are prioritised using the MoSCoW prioritisation method:
M=Must Have; S=Should Have; C=Could Have; W=Want
- (M= has to be satisfied for the final solution to be acceptable in terms of delivery dates, compliance, viability etc.
- S= high-priority requirement that should be included if possible -workarounds may be available
- C= a nice-to-have requirement
- W= want but will not be part of this project)
| Objectives & Deliverables |
Priority |
| O1 Undertake business analysis for pushing Purchase Orders out into eFinancials (or other potential future Finance system) |
|
|
D1. analysis and mapping of current process (including continuations/partially receipted orders), workflows, and technical infrastructure for managing POs across Alma and eFinancials |
M |
|
D2. overview of risks and issues aligned to current state |
S |
| D3. option appraisal and evidenced recommendations to enable POs to be pushed out into eFinancials or other future finance system | M |
| D4. analysis and option appraisal for upgrade of account codes aligned to upgrade of chart of accounts | M |
| O2 Identify options to negate discrepancies relating to no commitment figures shown in eFinancials . | |
|
D5.identification and analysis of current discrepancies relating to commitment figures within eFinancials. |
S |
| O3 Identify options to negate discrepancies between expenditure figures in eFinancials and Alma relating to shared fund codes. | |
| D6. identification and analysis of current discrepancies relating to shared fund codes | S |
| D7. option appraisal and recommendations for process and technical enhancements aligned to O2 | M |
| O4 Identify options to reverse charge VAT in Sterling being fed back into finance system | |
| D8. analysis and mapping of current process in relation to reverse charging VAT in Sterling being fed into finance system | M |
| D9. option appraisal and recommendations for process and technical enhancements aligned to O3 | M |
| O5 Identify Implementation Project Requirements and Scope | |
| D10.using deliverables outlined above outline recommendations for requirements and scope for implementation | M |
| D11. outline wider process and system improvements / enhancements identified throughout analysis i.e. revised workflows to reduce manual interventions | C |
| D12. estimate resource requirements to implement D10 | S |
Benefits
- Support the digital transformation strategy by identifying areas of improvement aligned to available IT infrastructure and requirements for future infrastructure.
- Providing recommendations to improve:
- Faster processing cycles
- Reduction in discrepancies
- Improved account reconciliation
- Reduction in queries
- Carbon footprint (reducing paper handling, photocopying, storage and mail handling)
Success Criteria
- Robust Viability and Feasibility reviews identifying the benefits, risks and issues relating to progressing a two way feed between Alma and E-Financials (or other potential future Finance system) enabling informed decisions to be made on potential integration project.
- Identified project requirement, scope, and budget which enables a smooth transfer from analysis to integration project.
Project Milestones
| Target Date |
Previous Date | Title | Stage | Complete | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08-Jun-2018 | 02-Feb-2018 | Planning | Plan | No | |
| 13-Jul-2018 | 11-May-2018 | Business Analysis | Execute | No | |
| 10-Aug-2018 | 25-May-2018 | Delivery | Deliver | No | |
| 01-Sep-2018 | 08-Jun-2018 | Closure | Close | No |
